nitohri:

if you’re gonna shit on people for using fictional characters to motivate themselves well first of all what the fuck is your problem

bonsoirgrenouille:

cash or credit, fuckboy

bonsoirgrenouille:

cash or credit, fuckboy

homestarrunner:

cranialgames:

teapotsahoy:

vassraptor

coffeeandcockatiels:

Always make sure to start Wandows Ngrmadly.

#ia ia windows fhtagn

I don’t think this boot looks promising.

Wandows

Coach Z’s computer

homestarrunner:

cranialgames:

teapotsahoy:

vassraptor

coffeeandcockatiels:

Always make sure to start Wandows Ngrmadly.

#ia ia windows fhtagn

I don’t think this boot looks promising.

Wandows

Coach Z’s computer

dragontopcane:

bestlols:

It’s the little things, isn’t it?

i’m here to note that in the three seconds she took to read the message, the other woman appears to have moved from silencing her child to seducing a mildly uncomfortable man on the other side of the aisle.

dragontopcane:

bestlols:

It’s the little things, isn’t it?

i’m here to note that in the three seconds she took to read the message, the other woman appears to have moved from silencing her child to seducing a mildly uncomfortable man on the other side of the aisle.

pulpdrinker:

i have never seen something more clearly written by a straight white male

pulpdrinker:

i have never seen something more clearly written by a straight white male

warning: DJ Khaled

heroinpuppy:

I got a friend of a friend who helps manage a venue that booked Khaled a while ago. 11:00 PM, no show. 12:00 PM, no show. folks throwin shit at the stage. I think round 12:45 he shows up, spends ten minutes trying to get the crowd to chant his name, he plays two songs he had nothin to do with, walks off stage and somehow gets a drunk girl to follow him. they fuck in the elevator for less than a minute and Khaled leaves khum on the fuckin ground for the venue to clean up

afternoobs:

thegreendeceiver:

myheartbeatsuppeople:

the ol’ razzzle dazzle

No but actually this is a GREAT way to present a dress like this! A regular standing mannequin wouldn’t show off all the layers and details in the skirt!

it also wouldn’t show off all the ol’ razzle dazzle

afternoobs:

thegreendeceiver:

myheartbeatsuppeople:

the ol’ razzzle dazzle

No but actually this is a GREAT way to present a dress like this! A regular standing mannequin wouldn’t show off all the layers and details in the skirt!

it also wouldn’t show off all the ol’ razzle dazzle

algetard:

mattgoop:

color combos are fun.

why am i even going to art school

i’ve just learned it all here

falloutboyonboy:

themaefive:

axonsandsynapses:

yuletidekarkat:

dannygayhealani:

creatingaquietmind:

the speech impediment of the 21st century (by Marc Johns)

I’ll fuck you up buddy this is not a speech impediment it’s linguistic evolution!! the existence of the phrase “Aisha was like” allows the speaker to convey whatever Aisha said without making the listener assume they’re quoting Aisha directly while still maintaining the FEELING of what Aisha said.
ie, Aisha said she didn’t want to go out with me VERSUS Aisha was like, “I’d rather kiss a Wookie”.
the addition of “XYZ was like” lets the speaker be more expressive and efficient and it is a totally valid method of communicating information!!

With the way language has evolved, this is one of the few ways I can even think of to express in casual conversation what someone said. 
"So I said to Aisha," is certainly used, but if you remove the "so," which implies casual tone ("and" can be used in the same way), you get
"I said to Aisha," which is really formal in most English dialects/variations. I don’t know about all, but in New England dialects, you sound like you’re reading aloud from a novel.
"I told Aisha," is really only used when you continue to describe, not tell, what you told her. Ex: "I told Aisha that James was too punk for her" works while, "I told Aisha, ‘James is too punk for you’" crosses the line back into formalness of the "I said."
Things like “I asked” or “I answered [with]” are similar levels of casual and efficient to the “So, I said [or say, as many conversations about the past take place in present tense anyway, as if the speaker is giving a play-by-play in the moment]” but are specific to only certain situations. 
"I was like, 'Marc Johns, what is your obsession with restoring archaic speech patterns and interfering with the natural progression of English from complex to efficient?'" envelopes all of these easily and is accessible and crisp, and allows for more variations on inflection than the others.
Of course, James is probably like, “I already fucking said that.” But eh, I tried adding on.

#linguistics#a.k.a. how I learned to stop worrying and love the evolution of the English language without being a discriminatory elitist jerk (via crystalandrock)

This a million times.

aaaaand to add onto the list of problems with the original post, it’s also ableist because the artist’s like, “lmao i’m gonna make an edgy, revolutionary comment on ~modern language~ and how it’s devolved since the time of SHAKESPEARE and REAL LITERATURE by using speech impediments as a punchline” ‘cos wow, it’s not like there are people who struggle with speech disorders and wouldn’t appreciate being treated like a joke!!

falloutboyonboy:

themaefive:

axonsandsynapses:

yuletidekarkat:

dannygayhealani:

creatingaquietmind:

the speech impediment of the 21st century (by Marc Johns)

I’ll fuck you up buddy this is not a speech impediment it’s linguistic evolution!! the existence of the phrase “Aisha was like” allows the speaker to convey whatever Aisha said without making the listener assume they’re quoting Aisha directly while still maintaining the FEELING of what Aisha said.

ie, Aisha said she didn’t want to go out with me VERSUS Aisha was like, “I’d rather kiss a Wookie”.

the addition of “XYZ was like” lets the speaker be more expressive and efficient and it is a totally valid method of communicating information!!

With the way language has evolved, this is one of the few ways I can even think of to express in casual conversation what someone said. 

"So I said to Aisha," is certainly used, but if you remove the "so," which implies casual tone ("and" can be used in the same way), you get

"I said to Aisha," which is really formal in most English dialects/variations. I don’t know about all, but in New England dialects, you sound like you’re reading aloud from a novel.

"I told Aisha," is really only used when you continue to describe, not tell, what you told her. Ex: "I told Aisha that James was too punk for her" works while, "I told Aisha, ‘James is too punk for you’" crosses the line back into formalness of the "I said."

Things like “I asked” or “I answered [with]” are similar levels of casual and efficient to the “So, I said [or say, as many conversations about the past take place in present tense anyway, as if the speaker is giving a play-by-play in the moment]” but are specific to only certain situations. 

"I was like, 'Marc Johns, what is your obsession with restoring archaic speech patterns and interfering with the natural progression of English from complex to efficient?'" envelopes all of these easily and is accessible and crisp, and allows for more variations on inflection than the others.

Of course, James is probably like, “I already fucking said that.” But eh, I tried adding on.

 (via crystalandrock)

This a million times.

aaaaand to add onto the list of problems with the original post, it’s also ableist because the artist’s like, “lmao i’m gonna make an edgy, revolutionary comment on ~modern language~ and how it’s devolved since the time of SHAKESPEARE and REAL LITERATURE by using speech impediments as a punchline” ‘cos wow, it’s not like there are people who struggle with speech disorders and wouldn’t appreciate being treated like a joke!!

neptunain:

my favorite band is the beatles. i also enjoy the taste of flour